Skip to contents

Purpose

FastSurvival is designed for repeated evaluation inside large simulation loops. This vignette shows how to benchmark each estimation and testing function against an established reference and reports representative results. The benchmark code is shown but not executed when the vignette is built, because timing many microbenchmark replicates would exceed the build-time limits. To reproduce the numbers, run the code blocks interactively. The same code is collected in the tools/benchmark_speed.R script shipped in the package sources.

The reported figures are median times from microbenchmark replicates on a single desktop machine. Absolute timings depend on hardware, sample size, and event rate, so the ratios matter more than the raw values.

Setup

The key to the speed gain is that the analysis functions accept pre-sorted vectors. Inside a simulation loop the data are sorted once and reused, so the sort cost is paid a single time rather than on every call. We build a single two-group dataset of 500 subjects with simdata_fast() and prepare the sorted vectors, the binary arm indicator, and the restriction horizon used by the time-restricted methods.

dataset <- simdata_fast(
  nsim     = 1,
  n        = 500,
  a.time   = c(0, 12.5),
  a.rate   = 40,
  e.median = list(5.811, 4.3),
  seed     = 1
)

# Sort once and reuse, the intended pattern for the pre-sorted fast path.
ord <- order(dataset$tte)
t_s <- dataset$tte[ord]
e_s <- dataset$event[ord]
g_s <- dataset$group[ord]

# Control is group 1, treatment is group 2.
arm <- as.integer(dataset$group == 2)

# Restriction horizon within both arms' follow-up.
tau <- floor(min(tapply(t_s, g_s, max)))

# Factor arm for the nphRCT reference used in the rmw_fast benchmark.
df_rmw <- data.frame(
  tte   = dataset$tte,
  event = dataset$event,
  arm   = factor(ifelse(dataset$group == 1, "control", "treatment"),
                 levels = c("control", "treatment"))
)

survfit_fast vs survfit + summary

microbenchmark(
  fast = survfit_fast(t_s, e_s, t_eval = tau, presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = summary(survfit(Surv(tte, event) ~ 1, data = dataset), times = tau),
  times = 1000
)

survdiff_fast vs survdiff

microbenchmark(
  fast = survdiff_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1, presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = survdiff(Surv(tte, event) ~ group, data = dataset),
  times = 1000
)

coxph_fast vs coxph

microbenchmark(
  fast = coxph_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1, presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = coxph(Surv(tte, event) ~ I(group == 2), data = dataset),
  times = 1000
)

rmst_fast vs survRM2::rmst2

microbenchmark(
  fast = rmst_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, tau = tau, side = 1,
                   presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = survRM2::rmst2(time = dataset$tte, status = dataset$event,
                        arm = arm, tau = tau),
  times = 1000
)

survdiff_fast(weight = “fh”) vs nph::logrank.test

microbenchmark(
  fast = survdiff_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1,
                       weight = "fh", rho = 0, gamma = 1, presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = nph::logrank.test(dataset$tte, dataset$event, dataset$group,
                           rho = 0, gamma = 1),
  times = 1000
)

wmst_fast vs survWMST::wmst

The window mean survival time is benchmarked against wmst() from the survWMST package. survWMST is distributed on GitHub (pauknemj/survWMST), not CRAN, so this benchmark is shown as a static block rather than a live chunk, and the vignette carries no undeclared dependency. Install survWMST with remotes::install_github("pauknemj/survWMST") and run the block to reproduce it.

microbenchmark(
  fast = wmst_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, tau1 = 0, tau2 = tau,
                   side = 1, presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = survWMST::wmst(time = dataset$tte, status = dataset$event,
                        arm = arm, tau0 = 0, tau1 = tau),
  times = 1000
)

milestone_fast vs survfit + summary

microbenchmark(
  fast = milestone_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, tau = tau, side = 1,
                        presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = summary(survfit(Surv(tte, event) ~ group, data = dataset),
                 times = tau),
  times = 1000
)

medsurv_fast vs nph::nphparams

microbenchmark(
  fast = medsurv_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1,
                      method = "nph", presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = nph::nphparams(time = dataset$tte, event = dataset$event,
                        group = as.integer(dataset$group == 2),
                        param_type = "Q", param_par = 0.5),
  times = 1000
)

maxcombo_fast vs nph::logrank.maxtest

microbenchmark(
  fast = maxcombo_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1,
                       rho = c(0, 0, 1), gamma = c(0, 1, 0), presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = nph::logrank.maxtest(dataset$tte, dataset$event,
                              as.integer(dataset$group == 2)),
  times = 1000
)

rmw_fast vs nphRCT::wlrt

rmw_fast() combines a standard and a modestly-weighted log-rank statistic, so the reference computes both weighted log-rank components with nphRCT.

microbenchmark(
  fast = rmw_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1, s_star = 0.5,
                  presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = {
    nphRCT::wlrt(Surv(tte, event) ~ arm, data = df_rmw,
                 method = "mw", s_star = 1)
    nphRCT::wlrt(Surv(tte, event) ~ arm, data = df_rmw,
                 method = "mw", s_star = 0.5)
  },
  times = 1000
)

wkm_fast vs nphsim::wkm.Stat

The weighted Kaplan-Meier (Pepe-Fleming) test is benchmarked against wkm.Stat() from the nphsim package. nphsim is distributed on GitHub (keaven/nphsim), not CRAN, so this benchmark is shown as a static block. Install nphsim with remotes::install_github("keaven/nphsim") and run the block to reproduce it.

microbenchmark(
  fast = wkm_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, side = 1, weight = "PF",
                  presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = nphsim::wkm.Stat(survival = dataset$tte, cnsr = 1 - dataset$event,
                          trt = ifelse(dataset$group == 1,
                                       "control", "experimental")),
  times = 1000
)

ahsw_fast vs survAH::ah2

microbenchmark(
  fast = ahsw_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, tau = tau, side = 1,
                   presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = survAH::ah2(time = dataset$tte, status = dataset$event,
                     arm = arm, tau = tau),
  times = 1000
)

ahr_fast vs AHR::ahrKM

The Kalbfleisch-Prentice average hazard ratio is benchmarked against ahrKM() from the AHR package, the reference implementation used by Dormuth et al. (2024). Because AHR has been archived on CRAN, this benchmark is shown as a static block rather than a live chunk. Install AHR with remotes::install_github("cran/AHR") and run the block to reproduce it.

microbenchmark(
  fast = ahr_fast(t_s, e_s, g_s, control = 1, tau = tau, side = 1,
                  presorted = TRUE),
  ref  = AHR::ahrKM(tau, Surv(tte, event) ~ group, dataset),
  times = 1000
)

Representative results

The table below summarizes representative median timings on the n = 500 two-group dataset generated above, with presorted = TRUE and one-sided tests where applicable. The exact values will differ on your machine, but the order of magnitude of the speedup is stable.

Function Replaces Approximate speed gain
survfit_fast() survfit() + summary() at one time point ~40x
survdiff_fast() survdiff() ~40x
coxph_fast() coxph() (point estimate + Wald CI) ~30x
rmst_fast() survRM2::rmst2() ~40x
survdiff_fast(weight = "fh") nph::logrank.test() ~350x
wmst_fast() survWMST::wmst() ~560x
milestone_fast() survfit() + summary() at a milestone ~20x
medsurv_fast() nph::nphparams() ~30x
maxcombo_fast() nph::logrank.maxtest() ~320x
rmw_fast() nphRCT::wlrt() (two components) ~80x
ahsw_fast() survAH::ah2() ~410x
ahr_fast() AHR::ahrKM() ~130x

Why it is faster

Each function avoids the overhead that the standard implementations incur on every call. The standard functions parse a formula, build an S3 model object, and construct intermediate vectors before producing the result, which is appropriate for interactive use but wasteful when the same operation is repeated thousands of times. The FastSurvival functions take plain vectors, do the core computation in a single C++ pass over the data, and return a lightweight numeric vector. When the input is already sorted the sort cost is avoided entirely. In a simulation loop these savings accumulate across every iteration.